In the era of e-commerce and climate change, sustainability in last-mile delivery operations has a pivotal role. The boost of online shopping and increasing expectations of fast shipping means more vehicles on the road with lower utilization, higher frequency of deliveries, and more stops per route. These conditions have a direct impact on the environmental footprint of e-commerce.
This situation raises the question of whether consumers’ behavior can be influenced by providing information about the environmental footprint of the shipping option they select for their home delivery. We are interested in learning what are the key drivers that motivate consumers to wait for their home deliveries and how can this outcome enable decision-makers to not only reduce CO2 emissions but also save fuel costs.
..Providing an option that says ‘same-day delivery is equivalent to killing 3000 trees’ compared with one that says ‘if you wait three to four days, then it’s equivalent to killing 10 trees, and by the way we are going to plant 15,’ can really drive behavior.
(Huffpost, 2017)
Velazquez-Martinez, J.C. (2018, April 4). “Verify true about one-day shipping”. Interview by David Schechter. Live [Television broadcast]. Dallas: WFAA Chanel 8 ABC.
website
On Phase 1, we tested customer intentions to Willing to Wait (WtW). We studied the results of a stratified survey to 360 customers of one of the largest retail company in Mexico (Coppel). The survey was conducted at the moment of the delivery, at the customer’s home, across nine regions of Mexico.
We evaluated the effectiveness of explaining carbon footprint in equivalent terms of trash, and trees to the customers. As you can see customers given the emissions saved in terms of trees had the highest willingness to wait for their package.
The field study shows that 30% of consumers who are not willing to wait when given economic incentives are willing to wait longer for home deliveries when given environmental incentives.
Additionally, equivalent information using trees is the most effective at incentivizing consumers to wait longer and it shows the potential for firms to reduce by 25% their last mile delivery carbon footprint. It might also improve customer satisfaction by providing understandable “environmental information” to incentive consumers of pro-environmental choices.
The following figure presents the methodology we followed to estimate the savings of CO2 emissions.
Our study challenges previous studies that claimed that individuals with higher socioeconomic status, younger age, and female gender are more environmentally concerned. Our results show that these factors do not affect consumers’ willingness to choose green deliveries when they are provided with relatable information about environmental impact.
